It’s hard to explain to European friends the how and why of the division cleaving asunder convention. The sober reflection this parent of parliaments traditionally promotes appears to have to have evaporated in the heat of wild anxiety. (Julian of Norwich was quoted on the radio earlier: she tends to be wheeled out, alas, when hopelessness hoves over the horizon.)
This evening’s Parliamentary vote on the Government’s EU Withdrawal Bill, designed to protect the Irish border, has the potential to explode the Referendum’s result.
Who knew the bloated tedium that would result from David Cameron’s attempt to make his mark? Who appreciated the fickleness of an ill-informed electorate? The vacuity of detail in the run-up to that June 2016 decision now appears so frantically obvious it’s hard to grasp how we didn’t ask more pertinent questions.
Tiens: hindsight, huh?
Setting aside the partisan nature of war, it would be interesting to listen to those who experienced the Blitz comment on the politics [poliblitz seems more accurate] of these self-immolating days. Would they see beyond the rats-in-a-sack spectacle or sit in expectation of the monumental fall-out?